Have you ever
actually stopped to consider the question
"What is
grammar?"
If you take the time
to think carefully about it, you may
actually find that
you experience problems pinning down an
interpretation of
this complex linguistic field. That is exactly
why it causes so many
people so much confusion.
In addressing the
question of "what is grammar", the Oxford
Dictionary defines
grammar as:
The way in which
words are put together to form proper
sentences.
Although that is a
pretty good description of grammar, the
truth is, grammar is
much, much more than that.
To understand what
grammar is, it is useful to consider what
our lives would be
like without it.
What is grammar? A
life without grammar
When complicating the
question of what is grammar, it's
useful to go back to
the dawn of time when cavemen first
started to
communicate with each other using language. It is
highly probable that
they initially started to invent words to
describe objects and
phenomena around them. Perhaps they
used words such as
"woman", "man", "tree", "cave",
"fire",
"hot",
"beast", "hunt", etc. They may have found these words
extremely useful for
communicating with one another, but it
wouldn't be long
until the lack of grammar became a problem,
especially when they
started to combine words to increase
the level at which
they could communicate.
Let's say a man tried
to warn his wife that the fire was hot:
"woman"
"big" "fire" "hot"
Did he warn the big
woman that the fire was hot? Or did he
warn the woman that
the big fire was hot?
Depending upon the
way in which she interpreted his warning,
he may just have
found himself being hit around the head with
a heavy stick. You
see, one of the problems with words
without grammar, is
that they can't really handle complicated
situations very well.
Placing a string of words together without
appropriate
consideration of syntax, phonetics, morphology,
and semantics entails
that the meaning of these words can be
open to
interpretation and easily confused.
For example, if a
caveman where to shout:
"beast!"
"woman!"
Is he warning the
woman that there is a beast nearby? Or is
he calling the woman
a beast? Is the women about to be
attacked by a beast?
Or has he just slain a beast and is
declaring his
success?
The problem is that
words alone cannot convey the
relationship between
objects and actions. If the women was
confused as to what
the caveman was telling her, how should
she reply?
"beast!"
"woman!"
Is she asking him
whether there is a beast nearby? Or is she
questioning whether
or not he called her a beast? Is she
asking if she is
about to be attacked by a beast? Or is she
confirming that he
just slain a beast and is declaring his
success?
...you get the
picture. We now understand why we need
grammar.
No comments:
Post a Comment