Hardy added the subtitle, A Pure Woman, at
the last moment. It has created problems for readers and critics ever since the
novel's appearance. The title offends many on moral
grounds, for whom Tess is a "ruined," immoral woman. Others are
puzzled intellectually; what is Hardy's basis for calling her pure? Hardy
defended the subtitle in an 1892 interview with Raymond Blathwayt:
... I still
maintain that her innate purity remained intact to the very last; though I
frankly own that a certain outward purity left her on her last fall. I regarded
her then as being in the hands of circumstances, not morally responsible, a
mere corpse drifting with the current to her end.
The subtitle has been defended in various ways. For
example, Hardy is showing that the traditional Christian view equating virtue
and purity with virginity is wrong. Or Hardy is distinguishing between the act
and the intention, a distinction Angel Clare finally makes in the novel. Irving
Howe offers a more subtle explanation:
In her
incomparable vibrancy and lovingness, she comes to represent a spiritualized
transcendence of chastity. She dies three times, to live again:--first with
Alec D'Urberville, then with Angel Clare, and lastly with Alec again. Absolute
victim of her wretched circumstances, she is ultimately beyond their stain. She
embodies a feeling for the inviolability of the person, as it brings the
absolute of charity nearer to the warming Christian virtue of charity. Through
a dialectic of negation, Tess reaches purity of spirit even as she fails to
satisfy the standards of the world.
For F.B. Pinton, her purity derives from her
victimization:
... she is
the victim of chance--of heredity, physical and temperamental; of the position
she was born into, and all the other factors that impinge on her life. She
could not be held responsible for them; she was, in Hardy's words, "a pure
woman."
No comments:
Post a Comment