Tuesday, 30 September 2014
Aristotle's Theory of Imitation
Aristotle's Plot
Aristotle devotes great attention to the
nature, structure and basic elements of the ideal tragic plot. Tragedy is the
depiction of action consisting of incidents and events. Plot is the arrangement
of these incident and events. It contains the kernel of the action. Aristotle
says that plot is the first principle, the soul of tragedy. He lists six
formative elements of a tragedy – Plot, character, thought, melody, diction,
spectacle and gives the first place to plot.
The Greek word for 'poet' means a 'maker',
and the poet is a 'maker', not because he makes verses but he makes plots.
Aristotle differentiates between 'story' and 'plot'. The poet need not make his
story. Stories from history, mythology, or legend are to be preferred, for they
are familiar and understandable. Having chosen or invented the story, it must
be put to artistic selection and order. The incidents chosen must be 'serious',
and not 'trivial', as tragedy is an imitation of a serious action that arouse
pity and fear.
Aristotle says that the tragic plot must be a
complete whole. It must have a beginning, a middle and an end. It must have a
beginning, i.e. it must not flow out of some prior situation. The beginning
must be clear and intelligible. It must not provoke to ask 'why' and 'how'. A
middle is consequent upon a situation gone before. The middle is followed
logically by the end. And end is consequent upon a given situation, but is not
followed by any further incident. Thus artistic wholeness implies logical
link-up of the various incidents, events and situations that form the plot.
The plot must have a certain magnitude or
'length'. 'Magnitude' here means 'size'. It should be neither too small nor too
large. It should be long enough to allow the process of change from happiness
to misery but not too long to be forgotten before the end. If it is too small,
its different parts will not be clearly distinguishable from each other.
Magnitude also implies order and proportion and they depend upon the magnitude.
The different parts must be properly related to each other and to the whole.
Thus magnitude implies that the plot must have order, logic symmetry and
perspicuity.
Aristotle considers the tragic plot to be an
organic whole, and also having organic unity in its action. An action is a
change from happiness to misery or vice versa and tragedy must depict one such
action. The incidents impart variety and unity results by arranging the
incidents so that they all tend to the same catastrophe. There might be
episodes for they impart variety and lengthen the plot but they must be
properly combined with the main action following each other inevitably. It must
not be possible to remove or to invert them without injuring the plot.
Otherwise, episodic plots are the worst of all.
'Organc unity' cannot be provided only by the
presence of the tragic hero, for many incidents in hero's life cannot be
brought into relation with the rest. So there should be proper shifting and
ordering of material.
Aristotle joins organic unity of plot with
probability and necessity. The plot is not tied to what has actually happened
but it deals with what may probably or necessarily happen. Probability and
necessity imply that there should be no unrelated events and incidents. Words
and actions must be in character. Thus probability and necessity imply unity
and order and are vital for artistic unity and wholeness.
'Probability' implies that the tragic action
must be convincing. If the poet deals with something improbable, he must make
it convincing and credible. He dramatist must procure, "willing suspension
of disbelief". Thus a convincing impossibility is to be preferred to an
unconvincing possibility.
Aristotle rules out plurality of action. He
emphasizes the Unity of Action but has little to say about the Unity of Time
and the Unity of Place. About the Unity of Time he merely says that tragedy
should confine itself to a single revolution of the sun. As regards the Unity
of Place, Aristotle said that epic can narrate a number of actions going on all
together in different parts, while in a drama simultaneous actions cannot be
represented, for the stage is one part and not several parts or places.
Tragedy is an imitation of a 'serious action'
which arouses pity and fear. 'Serious' means important, weighty. The plot of a
tragedy essentially deals with great moral issues. Tragedy is a tale of
suffering with an unhappy ending. This means that the plot of a tragedy must be
a fatal one. Aristotle rules out fortunate plots for tragedy, for such plot
does not arouse tragic emotions. A tragic plot must show the hero passing from
happiness to misery and not from misery to happiness. The suffering of the hero
may be caused by an enemy or a stranger but it would be most piteous when it is
by chance caused by friends and relatives who are his well-wishers.
According to Aristotle, Tragic plots may be
of three kinds, (a) Simple, (b) Complex and (c) Plots based on or depicting
incidents of suffering. A Simple plot is without any Peripety and Anagnorisis
but the action moves forward uniformly without any violent or sudden change.
Aristotle prefers Complex plots. It must have Peripeteia, i.e. "reversal
of intention" and Anagnorisis, i.e. "recognition of truth".
While Peripeteia is ignorance of truth, Anagnorisis is the insight of truth
forced upon the hero by some signs or chance or by the logic events. In ideal
plot Anagnorisis follows or coincides with Peripeteia.
'Recognition' in the sense is closely akin to
reversal. Recognition and reversal can be caused by separate incidents. Often
it is difficult to separate the two. Complex plots are the best, for
recognition and reversal add the element of surprise and "the pitiable and
fearful incidents are made more so by the shock of surprise".
As regards the third kind of plot, Aristotle
rates it very low. It derives its effect from the depiction of torture, murder,
maiming, death etc. and tragic effect must be created naturally and not with
artificial and theatrical aids. Such plots indicate a deficiency in the art of
the poet.
In making plots, the poets should make their
denouements, effective and successful. Unraveling of the plot should be done
naturally and logically, and not by arbitrary devices, like chance or
supernatural devices. Aristotle does not consider Poetic Justice necessary for
Tragedy. He rules out plots with a double end i.e. plots in which there is
happiness for one, and misery for others. Such plots weaken the tragic effect.
It is more proper to Comedy. Thus Aristotle is against Tragi-comedy.
__________________________________________________________________________
Aristotle's Concept of Catharsis
Aristotle writes that the function of tragedy
is to arouse the emotions of pity and fear, and to affect the Katharsis of
these emotions. Aristotle has used the term Katharsis only once, but no phrase
has been handled so frequently by critics, and poets. Aristotle has not
explained what exactly he meant by the word, nor do we get any help from the
Poetics. For this reason, help and guidance has to be taken from his other
works. Further, Katharsis has three meaning. It means 'purgation',
'purification', and 'clarification', and each critic has used the word in one
or the other senses. All agree that Tragedy arouses fear and pity, but there
are sharp differences as to the process, the way by which the rousing of these
emotions gives pleasure.
Katharsis has been taken as a medical
metaphor, 'purgation', denoting a pathological effect on the soul similar to
the effect of medicine on the body. This view is borne out by a passage in the
Politics where Aristotle refers to religious frenzy being cured by certain
tunes which excite religious frenzy. In Tragedy:
…pity and fear, artificially stirred the
latent pity and fear which we bring with us from real life.
In the Neo-Classical era, Catharsis was taken
to be an allopathic treatment with the unlike curing unlike. The arousing of
pity and fear was supposed to bring about the purgation or 'evacuation' of
other emotions, like anger, pride etc. As Thomas Taylor holds:
We learn from the terrible fates of evil men
to avoid the vices they manifest.
F. L. Lucas rejects the idea that Katharsis
is a medical metaphor, and says that:
The theatre is not a hospital.
Both Lucas and Herbert Reed regard it as a
kind of safety valve. Pity and fear are aroused, we give free play to these
emotions which is followed by emotional relief. I. A. Richards' approach to the
process is also psychological. Fear is the impulse to withdraw and pity is the
impulse to approach. Both these impulses are harmonized and blended in tragedy
and this balance brings relief and repose.
The ethical interpretation is that the tragic
process is a kind of lustration of the soul, an inner illumination resulting in
a more balanced attitude to life and its suffering. Thus John Gassner says that
a clear understanding of what was involved in the struggle, of cause and
effect, a judgment on what we have witnessed, can result in a state of mental
equilibrium and rest, and can ensure complete aesthetic pleasure. Tragedy makes
us realize that divine law operates in the universe, shaping everything for the
best.
During the Renaissance, another set of
critics suggested that Tragedy helped to harden or 'temper' the emotions.
Spectators are hardened to the pitiable and fearful events of life by
witnessing them in tragedies.
Humphrey House rejects the idea of
'purgation' and forcefully advocates the 'purification' theory which involves
moral instruction and learning. It is a kind of 'moral conditioning'. He points
out that, 'purgation means cleansing'.
According to 'the purification' theory,
Katharsis implies that our emotions are purified of excess and defect, are
reduced to intermediate state, trained and directed towards the right objects
at the right time. The spectator learns the proper use of pity, fear and
similar emotions by witnessing tragedy. Butcher writes:
The tragic Katharsis involves not only the
idea of emotional relief, but the further idea of purifying the emotions so
relieved.
The basic defect of 'purgation' theory and
'purification' theory is that they are too much occupied with the psychology of
the audience. Aristotle was writing a treatise not on psychology but on the art
of poetry. He relates 'Catharsis' not to the emotions of the spectators but to
the incidents which form the plot of the tragedy. And the result is the
"clarification" theory.
The paradox of pleasure being aroused by the
ugly and the repellent is also the paradox involved in tragedy. Tragic
incidents are pitiable and fearful.
They include horrible events as a man
blinding himself, a wife murdering her husband or a mother slaying her children
and instead of repelling us produce pleasure. Aristotle clearly tells us that
we should not seek for every pleasure from tragedy, "but only the pleasure
proper to it". 'Catharsis' refers to the tragic variety of pleasure. The
Catharsis clause is thus a definition of the function of tragedy, and not of
its emotional effects on the audience.
Imitation does not produce pleasure in
general, but only the pleasure that comes from learning, and so also the
peculiar pleasure of tragedy. Learning comes from discovering the relation
between the action and the universal elements embodied in it. The poet might
take his material from history or tradition, but he selects and orders it in
terms of probability and necessity, and represents what, "might be".
He rises from the particular to the general and so is more universal and more
philosophical. The events are presented free of chance and accidents which
obscure their real meaning. Tragedy enhances understanding and leaves the
spectator 'face to face with the universal law'.
Thus according to this interpretation,
'Catharsis' means clarification of the essential and universal significance of
the incidents depicted, leading to an enhanced understanding of the universal
law which governs human life and destiny, and such an understating leads to
pleasure of tragedy. In this view, Catharsis is neither a medical, nor a
religious or moral term, but an intellectual term. The term refers to the
incidents depicted in the tragedy and the way in which the poet reveals their
universal significance.
The clarification theory has many merits.
Firstly, it is a technique of the tragedy and not to the psychology of the
audience. Secondly, the theory is based on what Aristotle says in the Poetics,
and needs no help and support of what Aristotle has said in Politics and
Ethics. Thirdly, it relates Catharsis both to the theory of imitation and to
the discussion of probability and necessity. Fourthly, the theory is perfectly
in accord with current aesthetic theories.
According to Aristotle the basic tragic
emotions are pity and fear and are painful. If tragedy is to give pleasure, the
pity and fear must somehow be eliminated. Fear is aroused when we see someone
suffering and think that similar fate might befall us. Pity is a feeling of
pain caused by the sight of underserved suffering of others. The spectator sees
that it is the tragic error or Hamartia of the hero which results in suffering
and so he learns something about the universal relation between character and
destiny.
To conclude, Arstotle's conception of
Catharsis is mainly intellectual. It is neither didactic nor theoretical,
though it may have a residual theological element. Aristotle's Catharsis is not
a moral doctrine requiring the tragic poet to show that bad men come to bad
ends, nor a kind of theological relief arising from discovery that God's laws
operate invisibly to make all things work out for the best.
_____________________________________
Aristotle's Theory of Imitation
Aristotle did not invent the term
"imitation". Plato was the first to use the word in relation with
poetry, but Aristotle breathed into it a new definite meaning. So poetic
imitation is no longer considered mimicry, but is regarded as an act of
imaginative creation by which the poet, drawing his material from the
phenomenal world, makes something new out of it.
In Aristotle's view, principle of imitation
unites poetry with other fine arts and is the common basis of all the fine
arts. It thus differentiates the fine arts from the other category of arts.
While Plato equated poetry with painting, Aristotle equates it with music. It
is no longer a servile depiction of the appearance of things, but it becomes a
representation of the passions and emotions of men which are also imitated by
music. Thus Aristotle by his theory enlarged the scope of imitation. The poet
imitates not the surface of things but the reality embedded within. In the very
first chapter of the Poetic, Aristotle says:
Epic poetry and Tragedy, Comedy also and
Dithyrambic poetry, as also the music of the flute and the lyre in most of
their forms, are in their general conception modes of imitation. They differ
however, from one another in three respects – their medium, the objects and the
manner or mode of imitation, being in each case distinct.
The medium of the poet and the painter are different.
One imitates through form and colour, and the other through language, rhythm
and harmony. The musician imitates through rhythm and harmony. Thus, poetry is
more akin to music. Further, the manner of a poet may be purely narrative, as
in the Epic, or depiction through action, as in drama. Even dramatic poetry is
differentiated into tragedy and comedy accordingly as it imitates man as better
or worse.
Aristotle says that the objects of poetic
imitation are "men in action". The poet represents men as worse than
they are. He can represent men better than in real life based on material
supplied by history and legend rather than by any living figure. The poet
selects and orders his material and recreates reality. He brings order out of
Chaos. The irrational or accidental is removed and attention is focused on the
lasting and the significant. Thus he gives a truth of an ideal kind. His mind
is not tied to reality:
It is not the function of the poet to relate
what has happened but what may happen – according to the laws of probability or
necessity.
History tells us what actually happened;
poetry what may happen. Poetry tends to express the universal, history the
particular. In this way, he exhibits the superiority of poetry over history.
The poet freed from the tyranny of facts, takes a larger or general view of
things, represents the universal in the particular and so shares the
philosopher's quest for ultimate truth. He thus equates poetry with philosophy
and shows that both are means to a higher truth. By the word 'universal'
Aristotle signifies:
How a person of a certain nature or type
will, on a particular occasion, speak or act, according to the law of
probability or necessity.
The poet constantly rises from the particular
to the general. He studies the particular and devises principles of general
application. He exceeds the limits of life without violating the essential laws
of human nature.
Elsewhere Aristotle says, "Art imitates
Nature". By 'Nature' he does not mean the outer world of created things
but "the creative force, the productive principle of the universe."
Art reproduce mainly an inward process, a physical energy working outwards,
deeds, incidents, situation, being included under it so far as these spring
from an inward, act of will, or draw some activity of thought or feeling. He
renders men, "as they ought to be".
The poet imitates the creative process of
nature, but the objects are "men in action". Now the 'action' may be
'external' or 'internal'. It may be the action within the soul caused by all
that befalls a man. Thus, he brings human experiences, emotions and passions
within the scope of poetic imitation. According to Aristotle's theory, moral
qualities, characteristics, the permanent temper of the mind, the temporary
emotions and feelings, are all action and so objects of poetic imitation.
Poetry may imitate men as better or worse
than they are in real life or imitate as they really are. Tragedy and epic
represent men on a heroic scale, better than they are, and comedy represents
men of a lower type, worse than they are. Aristotle does not discuss the third
possibility. It means that poetry does not aim at photographic realism. In this
connection R. A. Scott-James points out that:
Aristotle knew nothing of the
"realistic" or "fleshy" school of fiction – the school of
Zola or of Gissing.
Abercrombie, in contrast, defends Aristotle
for not discussing the third variant. He says:
It is just possible to imagine life exactly
as it is, but the exciting thing is to imagine life as it might be, and it is
then that imagination becomes an impulse capable of inspiring poetry.
Aristotle by his theory of imitation answers
the charge of Plato that poetry is an imitation of "shadow of
shadows", thrice removed from truth, and that the poet beguiles us with
lies. Plato condemned poetry that in the very nature of things poets have no
idea of truth. The phenomenal world is not the reality but a copy of the
reality in the mind of the Supreme. The poet imitates the objects and phenomena
of the world, which are shadowy and unreal. Poetry is, therefore, "the
mother of lies".
Aristotle, on the contrary, tells us that art
imitates not the mere shows of things, but the 'ideal reality' embodied in very
object of the world. The process of nature is a 'creative process'; everywhere
in 'nature there is a ceaseless and upward progress' in everything, and the
poet imitates this upward movement of nature. Art reproduces the original not
as it is, but as it appears to the senses. Art moves in a world of images, and
reproduces the external, according to the idea or image in his mind. Thus the
poet does not copy the external world, but creates according to his 'idea' of
it. Thus even an ugly object well-imitated becomes a source of pleasure. We are
told in "The Poetics":
Objects which in themselves we view with
pain, we delight to contemplate when reproduced with minute fidelity; such as
the forms of the most ignoble animals and dead bodies.
The real and the ideal from Aristotle's point
of view are not opposites; the ideal is the real, shorn of chance and accident,
a purified form of reality. And it is this higher 'reality' which is the object
of poetic imitation. Idealization is achieved by divesting the real of all that
is accidental, transient and particular. Poetry thus imitates the ideal and the
universal; it is an "idealized representation of character, emotion,
action – under forms manifest in sense." Poetic truth, therefore, is
higher than historical truth. Poetry is more philosophical, more conducive to
understanding than Philosophy itself.
Thus Aristotle successfully and finally
refuted the charge of Plato and provided a defence of poetry which has ever
since been used by lovers of poetry in justification of their Muse. He breathed
new life and soul into the concept of poetic imitation and showed that it is,
in reality, a creative process
_________________________________________________
Aristotle's concept of ideal tragic hero:
Hamartia
No passage in "The Poetics" with
the exception of the Catharsis phrase has attracted so much critical attention
as his ideal of the tragic hero.
The function of a tragedy is to arouse the
emotions of pity and fear and Aristotle deduces the qualities of his hero from
this function. He should be good, but not perfect, for the fall of a perfect
man from happiness into misery, would be unfair and repellent and will not
arouse pity. Similarly, an utterly wicked person passing from happiness to
misery may satisfy our moral sense, but will lack proper tragic qualities. His
fall will be well-deserved and according to 'justice'. It excites neither pity
nor fear. Thus entirely good and utterly wicked persons are not suitable to be
tragic heroes.
Similarly, according to Aristotelian law, a
saint would be unsuitable as a tragic hero. He is on the side of the moral
order and hence his fall shocks and repels. Besides, his martyrdom is a
spiritual victory which drowns the feeling of pity. Drama, on the other hand,
requires for its effectiveness a militant and combative hero. It would be
important to remember that Aristotle's conclusions are based on the Greek drama
and he is lying down the qualifications of an ideal tragic hero. He is here
discussing what is the very best and not what is good. Overall, his views are
justified, for it requires the genius of a Shakespeare to arouse sympathy for
an utter villain, and saints as successful tragic heroes have been extremely
rare.
Having rejected perfection as well as utter
depravity and villainy, Aristotle points out that:
"The ideal tragic hero … must be an
intermediate kind of person, a man not pre-eminently virtuous and just, whose
misfortune, however, is brought upon him not by vice or depravity but by some
error of judgment."
The ideal tragic hero is a man who stands
midway between the two extremes. He is not eminently good or just, though he
inclines to the side of goodness. He is like us, but raised above the ordinary
level by a deeper vein of feeling or heightened powers of intellect or will. He
is idealized, but still he has so much of common humanity as to enlist our
interest and sympathy.
The tragic hero is not evil or vicious, but
he is also not perfect and his disaster is brought upon him by his own fault.
The Greek word used here is "Hamartia" meaning "missing the
mark". He falls not because of the act of outside agency or evil but
because of Hamartia or "miscalculation" on his part. Hamartia is not
a moral failing and it is unfortunate that it was translated as "tragic
flaw" by Bradley. Aristotle himself distinguishes Hamartia from moral
failing. He means by it some error or judgment. He writes that the cause of the
hero's fall must lie "not in depravity, but in some error or Hamartia on
his part". He does not assert or deny anything about the connection of
Hamartia with hero's moral failings.
"It may be accompanied by moral
imperfection, but it is not itself a moral imperfection, and in the purest
tragic situation the suffering hero is not morally to blame."
Thus Hamartia is an error or miscalculation,
but the error may arise from any of the three ways: It may arise from
"ignorance of some fact or circumstance", or secondly, it may arise
from hasty or careless view of the special case, or thirdly, it may be an error
voluntary, but not deliberate, as acts committed in anger. Else and Martian
Ostwald interpret Hamartia and say that the hero has a tendency to err created
by lack of knowledge and he may commit a series of errors. This tendency to err
characterizes the hero from the beginning and at the crisis of the play it is
complemented by the recognition scene, which is a sudden change "from
ignorance to knowledge".
In fact, Hamartia is a word with various
shades of meaning and has been interpreted by different critics. Still, all
serious modern Aristotelian scholarship agreed that Hamartia is not moral
imperfection. It is an error of judgment, whether arising from ignorance of
some material circumstance or from rashness of temper or from some passion. It
may even be a character, for the hero may have a tendency to commit errors of
judgment and may commit series of errors. This last conclusion is borne out by
the play Oedipus Tyrannus to which Aristotle refers time and again and which
may be taken to be his ideal. In this play, hero's life is a chain or errors,
the most fatal of all being his marriage with his mother. If King Oedipus is
Aristotle's ideal hero, we can say with Butcher that:
"His conception of Hamartia includes all
the three meanings mentioned above, which in English cannot be covered by a
single term."
Hamartia is an error, or a series of errors,
"whether morally culpable or not," committed by an otherwise noble
person, and these errors derive him to his doom. The tragic irony lies in the
fact that hero may err mistakenly without any evil intention, yet he is doomed
no less than immorals who sin consciously. He has Hamartia and as a result his
very virtues hurry him to his ruin. Says Butcher:
"Othello in the modern drama, Oedipus in
the ancient, are the two most conspicuous examples of ruin wrought by
character, noble indeed, but not without defects, acting in the dark and, as it
seemed, for the best."
Aristotle lays down another qualification for
the tragic hero. He must be, "of the number of those in the enjoyment of
great reputation and prosperity". He must be a well-reputed individual
occupying a position of lofty eminence in society. This is so because Greed
tragedy, with which alone Aristotle was familiar, was written about a few
distinguished royal families. Aristotle considers eminence as essential for the
tragic hero. But Modern drama demonstrates that the meanest individual can also
serve as a tragic hero, and that tragedies of Sophoclean grandeur can be
enacted even in remote country solitudes.
However, Aristotle's dictum is quite
justified on the principle that, "higher the state, the greater the fall
that follows," or because heavens themselves blaze forth the death of
princes, while the death of a beggar passes unnoticed. But it should be
remembered that Aristotle nowhere says that the hero should be a king or at
least royally descended. They were the Renaissance critics who distorted
Aristotle and made the qualification more rigid and narrow.
Analysis of Paradise Lost
Paradise Lost Analysis
Literary Devices in Paradise Lost
Symbolism, Imagery, Allegory
Paradise Lost is about Adam and Eve's loss of
Paradise; their eating of the Forbidden Fruit has often been called the
"Fall" (as in, "fall from innocence" or "fall from
grace"), so it's no surprise...
Setting
Paradise Lost takes place right around what
Christians would say is the beginning of human history. The poem begins after
Satan's unsuccessful rebellion and the creation of the universe. Milton's c...
Narrator Point of View
The narrator of Paradise Lost is an
omniscient third person. This means that the narrator is not a character in the
story (like Satan or Adam or Eve), but rather an external observer that can
enter...
Genre
Paradise Lost is an epic poem; epic poems
are…you guessed it, epic! They tend to be really long (hundreds of pages or
more!) and usually deal with incredibly serious, heroic topics. So, for e...
Tone
Milton's takes his poem very seriously; Adam
and Eve's fall was, for him, one of the greatest of human tragedies [it
"brought death into the world, and all our woe," (1.3)]. Satan's rebellion,
his...
Writing Style
Milton writes in a very elevated, allusive,
and dense style. If we had to pick one word to sum up his style that word would
be Latinate. Latinate means characteristic of the Latin language (a
"dead...
What's Up With the Title?
Paradise Lost is an elaborate retelling of
the most important – and tragic – incident in the book of Genesis, the first
book of the Bible. Genesis narrates the creation of the world and...
What's Up With the Ending?
The ending of Paradise Lost is one of the
most beautiful and depressing scenes in all of English literature. Just think
about it: humankind's one chance to have the perfect world (no suffering, no...
Tough-o-Meter
Paradise Lost is an incredibly difficult
poem; even those who have read it multiple times still have trouble with
certain parts, and it still takes a lot of patience (and time!) to read through
it....
Plot Analysis
Satan and his legions wake up in Hell.The
poem opens with Satan, who has just fallen from Heaven and wakes up on burning
lake. He realizes he's lost everything and is now stuck in a horrible place....
Booker's Seven Basic Plots Analysis:
Unclassifiable
In this section we like to explain how a
particularly literary work fits into one of seven basic plots; the problem here
is that Mr. John Milton has made the task difficult, actually nearly impossi...
Three Act Plot Analysis
Satan plots revenge in Hell (Books 1-2).Satan
is kicked out of Eden (Book 4); Raphael and Adam have a long talk (Books
5-8).Adam and Eve eat the fruit and are forced leave Paradise (Books 9-12).
Trivia
Milton composed Paradise Lost entirely blind.
That means, he dictated it out loud! (Source)Milton always looked sort of young
and girlish. His Cambridge buddies nicknamed him the "Lady of Christ's...
Steaminess Rating
There are several sex scenes in Paradise
Lost. In Book 2, we learn that Satan had sex with his daughter Sin and produced
Death, who in turn raped his mother Sin. As a contrast, in Book 4 Adam and E...
Allusions
There are literally hundreds of allusions in
Paradise Lost, many of them to the Bible. Rather than list every single
possible allusion – which would probably take a few years – we've listed som...
Sunday, 21 September 2014
Nobel Prize in Literature winners
- Rudyard Kipling (1907): UK
- Rabindranath Tagore (1913): India
- W. B. Yeats (1923): Ireland
- George Bernard Shaw (1925): Ireland
- Sinclair Lewis (1930): US
- John Galsworthy (1932): UK
- Eugene O'Neill (1936): US
- Pearl S. Buck (1938): US
- T. S. Eliot (1948): UK (born in the US)
- William Faulkner (1949): US
- Bertrand Russell (1950): UK
- Winston Churchill (1953): UK
- Ernest Hemingway (1954): US
- John Steinbeck (1962): US
- Samuel Beckett (1969): Ireland (lived in France much of his life)
- Patrick White (1973): Australia
- Saul Bellow (1976): US
- Isaac Bashevis Singer (1978): US (born in Poland)
- William Golding (1983): UK
- Wole Soyinka (1986): Nigeria
- Joseph Brodsky (1987): US (born in Russia)
- Nadine Gordimer (1991): South Africa
- Derek Walcott (1992): St Lucia, West Indies
- Toni Morrison (1993): US
- Seamus Heaney (1995): Ireland
- V. S. Naipaul (2001): UK (born in Trinidad)
- J. M. Coetzee (2003): South Africa
- Harold Pinter (2005): UK
- Doris Lessing (2007): UK (grew-up in Zimbabwe)
- Alice Munro (2013): Canada
English literature since 1901
1901–1939 Modernism[edit]
A major British lyric poet of the first decades of the 20th century was Thomas Hardy (1840–1928). Though not a modernist, Hardy was an important transitional figure between the Victorian era and the 20th century. A major novelist of the late 19th century, Hardy lived well into the third decade of the 20th century, but because of the adverse criticism of his last novel, Jude the Obscure, in 1895, from that time Hardy concentrated on publishing poetry. On the other hand another significant transitional figure between Victorians and modernists, the late-19th-century novelist, Henry James (1843–1916), continued to publish major works into the 20th century. James had lived in Europe since 1875 and became a British citizen, but this was only in 1915, and he was born in America and spent his formative years there.[216] Another immigrant, Polish-born modernist novelist Joseph Conrad (1857–1924) published his first important work, Heart of Darkness in 1899 and Lord Jim in 1900. The American exponent of Naturalism Theodore Dreiser's (1871–1945) Sister Carrie was also published in 1900. However, the Victorian Gerard Manley Hopkins's (1844–89) highly original poetry was not published until 1918, long after his death, while another major modernist poet, Irishman W. B. Yeats's (1865–1939), career began late in the Victorian era. Yeats was one of the foremost figures of 20th-century literature. A pillar of both the Irish and British literary establishments, in his later years he served as an Irish Senator for two terms. Yeats was a driving force behind the Irish Literary Revival. In 1923 he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature as the first Irishman so honoured[217] Yeats is generally considered one of the few writers who completed their greatest works after being awarded the Nobel Prize; such works include The Tower (1928) andThe Winding Stair and Other Poems (1929).[218]
But while modernism was to become an important literary movement in the early decades of the new century, there were also many fine writers who, like Thomas Hardy, were not modernists. During the early decades of the 20th century the Georgian poets like Rupert Brooke (1887–1915), Walter de la Mare (1873–1956), John Masefield (1878–1967, Poet Laureate from 1930) maintained a conservative approach to poetry by combining romanticism, sentimentality and hedonism, sandwiched as they were between the Victorian era, with its strict classicism, and Modernism, with its strident rejection of pure aestheticism.Edward Thomas (1878–1917) is sometimes treated as another Georgian poet.[219] Thomas enlisted in 1915 and is one of the First World War poets along with Wilfred Owen (1893–1918), Rupert Brooke (1887–1915), Isaac Rosenberg (1890–1917), Edmund Blunden (1896–1974) and Siegfried Sassoon (1886–1967). Irish playwrights George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950) and J.M. Synge (1871–1909) were influential in British drama. Shaw's career began in the last decade of the 19th century, while Synge's plays belong to the first decade of the 20th century. Synge's most famous play, The Playboy of the Western World, "caused outrage and riots when it was first performed" in Dublin in 1907.[220] George Bernard Shaw turned the Edwardian theatre into an arena for debate about important political and social issues, like marriage, class, "the morality of armaments and war" and the rights of women.[221] An important dramatist in the 1920s, and later, was Irishman Sean O'Casey (1880–1964). Also in the 1920s and later Noël Coward (1899–1973) achieved enduring success as a playwright, publishing more than 50 plays from his teens onwards. Many of his works, such as Hay Fever (1925), Private Lives (1930),Design for Living (1932), Present Laughter (1942) and Blithe Spirit (1941), have remained in the regular theatre repertoire.
Novelists who are not considered modernists include: Rudyard Kipling (1865–1936) who was also a successful poet; H. G. Wells (1866–1946); John Galsworthy (1867–1933), (Nobel Prize in Literature, 1932) whose works include a sequence of novels, collectively called The Forsyte Saga (1906–21); Arnold Bennett (1867–1931) author of The Old Wives' Tale (1908);G. K. Chesterton (1874–1936); and E.M. Forster's (1879–1970), though Forster's work is "frequently regarded as containing both modernist and Victorian elements".[222] H. G. Wells was a prolific author who is now best known for his science fictionnovels.[223] His most notable science fiction works include The War of the Worlds, The Time Machine, The Invisible Man andThe Island of Doctor Moreau all written in the 1890s. Other novels include Kipps (1905) and Mr Polly (1910). Forster's most famous work, A Passage to India 1924, reflected challenges to imperialism, while his earlier novels, such as A Room with a View (1908) and Howards End (1910), examined the restrictions and hypocrisy of Edwardian society in England. The most popular British writer of the early years of the 20th century was arguably Rudyard Kipling, a highly versatile writer of novels, short stories and poems, and to date the youngest ever recipient of the Nobel Prize for Literature (1907). Kipling's works include The Jungle Books (1894–95), The Man Who Would Be King and Kim (1901), while his inspirational poem "If—" (1895) is a national favourite and a memorable evocation of Victorian stoicism. Kipling's reputation declined during his lifetime, but more recently postcolonial studies has "rekindled an intense interest in his work, viewing it as both symptomatic and critical of imperialist attitudes".[224] Strongly influenced by his Christian faith, G. K. Chesterton was a prolific and hugely influential writer with a diverse output. His best-known character is the priest-detective Father Brown, who appeared only in short stories, while The Man Who Was Thursday published in 1908 is arguably his best-known novel. Of his nonfiction,Charles Dickens: A Critical Study (1906) has received some of the broadest-based praise. Another major work of science fiction, from the early 20th century, is A Voyage to Arcturus by Scottish writer David Lindsay, first published in 1920. It combines fantasy, philosophy, and science fiction in an exploration of the nature of good and evil and their relationship with existence. It has been described by writer Colin Wilson as the "greatest novel of the twentieth century",[225] and was a central influence on C. S. Lewis's Space Trilogy.[226] Also J. R. R. Tolkien said he read the book "with avidity", and praised it as a work of philosophy, religion, and morality.[227] It was made widely available in paperback form when published as one of the precursor volumes to the Ballantine Adult Fantasy series in 1968.
Alongside the more conservative writers mentioned, English literary modernism developed in the early 20th-century out of a general sense of disillusionment with Victorian era attitudes of certainty, conservatism, and belief in the idea of objective truth.[228] The movement was influenced by the ideas of Charles Darwin (1809–82) (On Origin of Species) (1859), Ernst Mach (1838–1916), Henri Bergson (1859–1941), Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), James G. Frazer (1854–1941), Karl Marx(1818–83) (Das Kapital, 1867), and the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud (1856–1939), among others.[229] The continental art movements of Impressionism, and later Cubism, were also important inspirations for modernist writers.[230]Important literary precursors of modernism, were: Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821–81) (Crime and Punishment (1866), The Brothers Karamazov (1880); Walt Whitman (1819–92) (Leaves of Grass) (1855–91); Charles Baudelaire (1821–67) (Les Fleurs du mal), Rimbaud (1854–91) (Illuminations, 1874); August Strindberg (1849–1912), especially his later plays.[231]
In addition to W. B. Yeats other important early modernists poets were the American poets T. S. Eliot (1888–1965) and Ezra Pound (1885–1972). Eliot became a British citizen in 1927 but was born and educated in America. His most famous works are: "Prufrock" (1915), The Wasteland (1921) and Four Quartets (1935–42). Ezra Pound was not only a major poet, first publishing part of The Cantos in 1917, but an important mentor for other poets, most significantly in his editorial advice for Eliot's poem The Wasteland.[232] Other important American poets writing early in the 20th century were William Carlos Williams (1883–1963), Robert Frost (1874–1963), who published his first collection in England in 1913, and H.D. (1886–1961). Gertrude Stein (1874–1946), an American expatriate living in Paris, famous for her line "Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose," was also an important literary force during this time period. American poet Marianne Moore (1887–1972) published from the 1920s to the 1960s.
Amongst the novelists, after Joseph Conrad, other important early modernist include Dorothy Richardson (1873–1957), whose novel Pointed Roof (1915), is one of the earliest example of the stream of consciousness technique, and D. H. Lawrence (1885–1930), who published The Rainbow in 1915, though it was immediately seized by the police.[233] Then in 1922 Irishman James Joyce's important modernist novel Ulysses appeared. Ulysses has been called "a demonstration and summation of the entire movement".[234] Set during one day in Dublin, in it Joyce creates parallels with Homer's epic poemthe Odyssey. William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury (1929) is another significant modernist novel, that uses the stream of consciousness technique.
The modernist movement continued through the 1920s and 1930s and beyond. During the period between the World Wars, American drama came to maturity, thanks in large part to the works of Eugene O'Neill (1888–1953). O'Neill's experiments with theatrical form and his use of both Naturalist and Expressionist techniques had a major influence on American dramatists. His best-known plays include Anna Christie (Pulitzer Prize 1922), Desire Under the Elms (1924), Strange Interlude (Pulitzer Prize 1928), Mourning Becomes Electra (1931). In poetry Hart Crane published The Bridge in 1930 and E. E. Cummings and Wallace Stevens were publishing from the 1920s until the 1950s. Similarly William Faulkner continued to publish until the 1950s and was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1949. However, not all those writing in these years were modernists, this includes Americans novelists Theodore Dreiser,Dos Passos, Ernest Hemingway, Scott Fitzgerald (The Great Gatsby 1925), and John Steinbeck.
Important British writers between the World Wars, include the Scottish poet Hugh MacDiarmid (1892–1978), who began publishing in the 1920s, and novelists Virginia Woolf (1882–1941), E. M. Forster (1879–1970) (A Passage to India, 1924),Evelyn Waugh (1903–66), P. G. Wodehouse (1881–1975) (who was not a modernist) and D. H. Lawrence. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover was published privately in Florence in 1928, though the unexpurgated version was not published in Britain until 1959.[232] Woolf was an influential feminist, and a major stylistic innovator associated with the stream-of-consciousnesstechnique in novels like Mrs Dalloway (1925) and To the Lighthouse (1927). Her 1929 essay A Room of One's Own contains her famous dictum; "A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction".[235] In the 1930s W. H. Auden and Christopher Isherwood co-authored verse dramas, of which The Ascent of F6 (1936) is the most notable, that owed much to Bertolt Brecht. T. S. Eliot had begun this attempt to revive poetic drama with Sweeney Agonistes in 1932, and this was followed by The Rock (1934), Murder in the Cathedral (1935) and Family Reunion (1939). There were three further plays after the war. In Parenthesis, a modernist epic poem by David Jones (1895–1974) first published in 1937, is probably the best known contribution from Wales to the literature of the First World War.
An important development, beginning really in the 1930s and 1940s was a tradition of working class novels that were actually written by writers who had a working-class background. Among these were coal miner Jack Jones, James Hanley, whose father was a stoker and who also went to sea as a young man, and other coal miner authors' Lewis Jones from South Walesand Harold Heslop from County Durham.
Aldous Huxley (1894–1963) published his famous dystopia Brave New World in 1932, the same year as John Cowper Powys's A Glastonbury Romance. Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer then appeared in 1934, though it was banned for many years in both Britain and America.[236] Samuel Beckett (1906–89) published his first major work, the novel Murphy in 1938. This same year Graham Greene's (1904–91) first major novel Brighton Rock was published. Then in 1939 James Joyce's published Finnegans Wake. In this work Joyce creates a special language to express the consciousness of a character who is dreaming.[237] It was also in 1939 that another Irish modernist poet, W. B. Yeats, died. British poet W. H. Auden was another significant modernists in the 1930s.
1940 to the 21st century[edit]
Though some have seen modernism ending by around 1939,[238] with regard to English literature, "When (if) modernism petered out and postmodernism began has been contested almost as hotly as when the transition from Victorianism to modernism occurred".[239] In fact a number of modernists were still living and publishing in the 1950s and 1960, including T. S. Eliot, William Faulkner, Dorothy Richardson, and Ezra Pound. Furthermore Basil Bunting, born in 1901, published little until Briggflatts in 1965 and Samuel Beckett, born in Ireland in 1906, continued to produce significant works until the 1980s, including Waiting for Godot (1953), Happy Days (1961), Rockaby (1981), though some view him as a post-modernist.[240]
Among British writers in the 1940s and 1950s were novelist Graham Greene whose works span the 1930s to the 1980s and poet Dylan Thomas, while Evelyn Waugh, W.H. Auden andT. S. Eliot continued publishing significant work. In 1947 Malcolm Lowry published Under the Volcano, while George Orwell's satire of totalitarianism, 1984, was published in 1949. One of the most influential novels of the immediate post-war period was William Cooper's naturalisticScenes from Provincial Life, a conscious rejection of the modernist tradition.[241] Graham Greene was a convert to Catholicism and his novels explore the ambivalent moral and political issues of the modern world. Notable for an ability to combine serious literary acclaim with broad popularity, his novels include Brighton Rock (1938), The Power and the Glory(1940), The Heart of the Matter (1948), A Burnt-Out Case (1961), and The Human Factor(1978). Other novelists writing in the 1950s and later were: Anthony Powell whose twelve-volume cycle of novels A Dance to the Music of Time, is a comic examination of movements and manners, power and passivity in English political, cultural and military life in the mid-20th century; comic novelist Kingsley Amis is best known for his academic satire Lucky Jim(1954); Nobel Prize laureate William Golding's allegorical novel Lord of the Flies 1954, explores how culture created by man fails, using as an example a group of British schoolboys marooned on a deserted island who try to govern themselves, but with disastrous results. Philosopher Iris Murdoch was a prolific writer of novels throughout the second half of the 20th century, that deal especially with sexual relationships, morality, and the power of the unconscious, including Under the Net(1954), The Black Prince (1973) and The Green Knight (1993). Scottish writer Muriel Spark pushed the boundaries of realism in her novels. Her first, The Comforters (1957) concerns a woman who becomes aware that she is a character in a novel; The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (1961), at times takes the reader briefly into the distant future, to see the various fates that befall its characters. Anthony Burgess is especially remembered for his dystopian novel A Clockwork Orange (1962), set in the not-too-distant future, which was made into a film by Stanley Kubrick in 1971. In the entirely different genre ofGothic fantasy Mervyn Peake (1911–68) published his highly successful Gormenghast trilogy between 1946 and 1959.
Doris Lessing from Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), published her first novel The Grass is Singing in 1950, after immigrating to England. She initially wrote about her African experiences. Lessing soon became a dominant presence in the English literary scene, frequently publishing right through the century, and won the nobel prize for literature in 2007. Other works by her include a sequence of five novels collectively called Children of Violence (1952–69), The Golden Notebook(1962), The Good Terrorist (1985), and a sequence of five science fiction novels the Canopus in Argos: Archives (1979–1983). Indeed from 1950 on a significant number of major writers came from countries that had over the centuries been settled by the British, other than America which had been producing significant writers from at least the Victorian period. There had of course been a few important works in English prior to 1950 from the then British Empire. The South African writer Olive Schreiner's famous novel The Story of an African Farm was published in 1883 and New Zealander Katherine Mansfield published her first collection of short stories, In a German Pension, in 1911. The first major novelist, writing in English, from the Indian sub-continent, R. K. Narayan, began publishing in England in the 1930s, thanks to the encouragement of English novelist Graham Greene.[242] Caribbean writer Jean Rhys's writing career began as early as 1928, though her most famous work, Wide Sargasso Sea, was not published until 1966. South Africa's Alan Paton's famousCry, the Beloved Country dates from 1948.
From Nigeria a number of writers have achieved an international reputation for works in English, including novelist Chinua Achebe, who published Things Fall Apart in 1958, as well as playwright Wole Soyinka and novelist Buchi Emecheta. Soyinka won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1986, as did South African novelist Nadine Gordimer in 1995. Other South African writers in English are novelist J.M. Coetzee (Nobel Prize 2003) and playwright Athol Fugard. Kenya's most internationally renown author is Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o who has written novels, plays and short stories in English. Poet Derek Walcott, from St Lucia in the Caribbean, was another Nobel Prize winner in 1992. Two Irishmen and an Australian were also winners in the period after 1940: novelist and playwright, Samuel Beckett (1969); poetSeamus Heaney (1995); Patrick White (1973) a major novelist in this period, whose first work was published in 1939. Another noteworthy Australian writer at the end of this period is poet Les Murray. Northern Ireland has produced major poets, including Paul Muldoon and Derek Mahon. While Scotland has in the late 20th century produced several important novelists, including James Kelman who like Samuel Beckett can create humour out of the most grim situations. How Late it Was, How Late, 1994, won the Booker Prize that year; A. L. Kennedy whose 2007 novel Day was named Book of the Year in the Costa Book Awards.[243] In 2007 she won the Austrian State Prize for European Literature;[244] Alasdair Gray whose Lanark: A Life in Four Books (1981) is a dystopian fantasy set in his home town Glasgow.
Among Canadian writers who have achieved an international reputation, are novelist and poet Margaret Atwood, poet, song writer and novelist Leonard Cohen, short story writer Alice Munro, and more recently poet Anne Carson. Another admired Canadian novelist and poet is Michael Ondaatje, who was born in Sri Lanka.
An important cultural movement in the British theatre which developed in the late 1950s and early 1960s was Kitchen sink realism (or "kitchen sink drama"), a term coined to describe art (the term itself derives from an expressionist painting by John Bratby), novels, film and television plays. The term angry young men was often applied members of this artistic movement. It used a style of social realism which depicts the domestic lives of the working class, to explore social issues and political issues. The drawing room plays of the post war period, typical of dramatists like Terence Rattigan and Noël Coward were challenged in the 1950s by these Angry Young Men, in plays like John Osborne's Look Back in Anger (1956). Arnold Wesker and Nell Dunn also brought social concerns to the stage.
Again In the 1950s, the absurdist play Waiting for Godot (1955) (originally En attendant Godot, 1952), by Irish writer Samuel Beckett profoundly affected British drama. The Theatre of the Absurd influenced Harold Pinter (born 1930), (The Birthday Party, 1958), whose works are often characterised by menace or claustrophobia. Beckett also influenced Tom Stoppard(born 1937) (Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, 1966). Stoppard's works are however also notable for their high-spirited wit and the great range of intellectual issues which he tackles in different plays. Both Pinter and Stoppard continued to have new plays produced into the 1990s. Michael Frayn (born 1933) is among other playwrights noted for their use of language and ideas. He is also a novelist.
Other Important playwrights whose careers began later in the century are: Caryl Churchill (Top Girls, 1982) and Alan Ayckbourn (Absurd Person Singular, 1972).
An important new element in the world of British drama, from the beginnings of radio in the 1920s, was the commissioning of plays, or the adaption of existing plays, by BBC radio. This was especially important in the 1950s and 1960s (and from the 1960s for television). Many major British playwrights in fact, either effectively began their careers with the BBC, or had works adapted for radio. Most of playwright Caryl Churchill's early experiences with professional drama production were as a radio playwright and, starting in 1962 with The Ants, there were nine productions with BBC radio drama up until 1973 when her stage work began to be recognised at the Royal Court Theatre.[245] Joe Orton's dramatic debut in 1963 was the radio play The Ruffian on the Stair, which was broadcast on 31 August 1964.[246] Tom Stoppard's "first professional production was in the fifteen-minute Just Before Midnight programme on BBC Radio, which showcased new dramatists".[246] John Mortimermade his radio debut as a dramatist in 1955, with his adaptation of his own novel Like Men Betrayed for the BBC Light Programme. But he made his debut as an original playwright with The Dock Brief, starring Michael Hordern as a hapless barrister, first broadcast in 1957 on BBC Radio's Third Programme, later televised with the same cast, and subsequently presented in a double bill with What Shall We Tell Caroline? at the Lyric Hammersmith in April 1958, before transferring to the Garrick Theatre. Mortimer is most famous for Rumpole of the Bailey a British television series which starred Leo McKernas Horace Rumpole, an aging London barrister who defends any and all clients. It has been spun off into a series of short stories, novels, and radio programmes.[247]
Other notable radio dramatists included Brendan Behan, and novelist Angela Carter. Novelist Susan Hill also wrote for BBC radio, from the early 1970s.[248] Irish playwright Brendan Behan, author of The Quare Fellow (1954), was commissioned by the BBC to write a radio play The Big House (1956); prior to this he had written two plays Moving Outand A Garden Party for Irish radio.[249]
Among the most famous works created for radio, are Dylan Thomas's Under Milk Wood (1954), Samuel Beckett's All That Fall (1957), Harold Pinter's A Slight Ache (1959) and Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons (1954).[250] Samuel Beckett wrote a number of short radio plays in the 1950s and 1960s, and later for television. Beckett's radio play Embers was first broadcast on the BBC Third Programme on 24 June 1959, and won the RAI prize at the Prix Italia awards later that year.[251]
While poets T. S. Eliot, W. H. Auden and Dylan Thomas were still publishing in this period, new poets starting their careers in the 1950s and 1960s included Philip Larkin (1922–85) (The Whitsun Weddings,1964), Ted Hughes (1930–98) (The Hawk in the Rain,1957) and Irishman (Northern Ireland) Seamus Heaney (born 1939) (Death of a Naturalist, 1966). Northern Ireland has also produced a number of other significant poets, including Derek Mahon and Paul Muldoon. In the 1960s and 1970sMartian poetry aimed to break the grip of 'the familiar', by describing ordinary things in unfamiliar ways, as though, for example, through the eyes of a Martian. Poets most closely associated with it are Craig Raine and Christopher Reid. Martin Amis, an important contemporary novelist, carried into fiction this drive to make the familiar strange. Another literary movement in this period was the British Poetry Revival was a wide-reaching collection of groupings and subgroupings that embraces performance, sound and concrete poetry. Leading poets associated with this movement include J. H. Prynne, Eric Mottram, Tom Raworth, Denise Riley and Lee Harwood. The Mersey Beat poets were Adrian Henri, Brian Patten and Roger McGough. Their work was a self-conscious attempt at creating an English equivalent to the Beats. Many of their poems were written in protest against the established social order and, particularly, the threat of nuclear war. Other noteworthy later 20th-century poets are Welshman R. S. Thomas, Geoffrey Hill, Charles Tomlinson and Carol Ann Duffy, who is the current poet laureate. Geoffrey Hill (born 1932) is considered one of the most distinguished English poets of his generation,[252]Although frequently described as a "difficult" poet, Hill has retorted that poetry supposed to be difficult can be "the most democratic because you are doing your audience the honour of supposing they are intelligent human beings".[253] Charles Tomlinson (born 1927) is another important English poet of an older generation, though "since his first publication in 1951, has built a career that has seen more notice in the international scene than in his native England; this may explain, and be explained by, his international vision of poetry".[254] The critic Michael Hennessy has described Tomlinson as "the most international and least provincial English poet of his generation".[255] His poetry has won international recognition and has received many prizes in Europe and the United States.[254]
One of Penguin Books most successful publications in the 1970s was Richard Adams's heroic fantasy Watership Down(1972). Evoking epic themes, it recounts the odyssey of a group of rabbits seeking to establish a new home. Another successful novel of the same era was John Fowles' The French Lieutenant's Woman (1969), with a narrator who freely admits the fictive nature of his story, and its famous alternative endings. This was made into a film in 1981 with a screenplay by Harold Pinter. Angela Carter (1940–1992) was a novelist and journalist, known for her feminist, magical realism, and picaresque works. Writing from the 1960s until the 1980s, her novels include, The Infernal Desire Machines of Doctor Hoffman 1972 and Nights at the Circus 1984. Margaret Drabble (born 1939) is a novelist, biographer and critic, who published from the 1960s into the 21st century. Her older sister, A. S. Byatt (born 1936) is best known for Possessionpublished in 1990.
Salman Rushdie is among a number of post Second World War writers from the former British colonies who permanently settled in Britain. Rushdie achieved fame with Midnight's Children 1981, which was awarded both the James Tait Black Memorial Prize and Booker prize, and was named Booker of Bookers in 1993. His most controversial novel The Satanic Verses 1989, was inspired in part by the life of Muhammad. V. S. Naipaul (born 1932), born in Trinidad, was another immigrant, who wrote among other things A House for Mr Biswas (1961) and A Bend in the River (1979). Naipaul won theNobel Prize in Literature.[256] Also from the West Indies is George Lamming (born 1927), who wrote In the Castle of My Skin(1953), while from Pakistan, came Hanif Kureshi (born 1954), a playwright, screenwriter, filmmaker, novelist and short story writer. His book The Buddha of Suburbia (1990) won the Whitbread Award for the best first novel, and was also made into a BBC television series. Another important immigrant writer Kazuo Ishiguro (born 1954) was born in Japan, but his parents immigrated to Britain when he was six.[257] His works include, The Remains of the Day 1989, Never Let Me Go 2005.
Martin Amis (1949) is one of the most prominent of contemporary British novelists. His best-known novels are Money (1984) and London Fields (1989). Pat Barker (born 1943) has won many awards for her fiction. English novelist and screenwriterIan McEwan (born 1948) is another of contemporary Britain's most highly regarded writers. His works include The Cement Garden (1978) and Enduring Love (1997), which was made into a film. In 1998 McEwan won the Man Booker Prize withAmsterdam. Atonement (2001) was made into an Oscar-winning film. McEwan was awarded the Jerusalem Prize in 2011.Zadie Smith's Whitbread Book Award winning novel White Teeth (2000), mixes pathos and humour, focusing on the later lives of two war time friends in London. Julian Barnes (born 1946) is another successful living novelist, who won the 2011 Man Booker Prize for his book The Sense of an Ending, while three of his earlier books had been shortlisted for the Booker Prize: Flaubert's Parrot (1984), England, England (1998), and Arthur & George (2005). He has also written crime fiction under the pseudonym Dan Kavanagh.
Two significant contemporary Irish novelists are John Banville (born 1945) and Colm Tóibín (born 1955). Banville is alsoadapter of dramas, and screenwriter[258] and writes detective novels under the pseudonym Benjamin Black. Banville has won numerous awards: The Book of Evidence was shortlisted for the Booker Prize and won the Guinness Peat Aviation award in 1989; his eighteenth novel, The Sea, won the Booker Prize in 2005; he was awarded the Franz Kafka Prize in 2011. Colm Tóibín (Irish),1955) is a novelist, short story writer, essayist, playwright, journalist, critic, and, most recently, poet. The contemporary Australian novelist Peter Carey (born 1943) is one of only two writers to have won the Booker Prize twice.
American[edit]
From 1940 into the 21st century, American playwrights, poets and novelists have continued to be internationally prominent. The following is a list of some of the more important writers (along with some important early works):
Novelists: Russian-born Vladimir Nabokov (Lolita, 1956), John Updike (Rabbit Run, 1960), Thomas Pynchon (V, 1963),Richard Ford, Eudora Welty (mainly short stories), Richard Wright, James Baldwin (Go Tell it on the Mountain, (1953), Saul Bellow (Herzog 1964)*, Bernard Malamud (The Fixer, 1967), Joyce Carol Oates, Cynthia Ozick, Toni Morrison*, Philip Roth(Portnoy's Complaint, 1969), Don DeLillo, Jane Smiley, David Foster Wallace, Isaac Bashevis Singer.*
Playwrights: Arthur Miller (Death of a Salesman, 1949), Tennessee Williams (A Streetcar Named Desire, 1947), Edward Albee (Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, 1962), David Mamet.
Poets: John Ashberry, Robert Lowell (Life Studies, 1959), Charles Olson, Louise Glück, Elizabeth Bishop (North and South, 1946), Alan Ginsberg (Howl, 1956), Robert Bly (Silence in the Snowy Fields, 1962), Richard Wilbur, Sylvia Plath (Ariel, 1965), Amy Clampitt, Robert Pinsky, Mary Oliver, James Wright, Billy Collins.
- Nobel Prize winners
Post-modern literature[edit]
Main article: Postmodern literature
The term Postmodern literature is used to describe certain tendencies in post-World War II literature. It is both a continuation of the experimentation championed by writers of the modernist period (relying heavily, for example, on fragmentation, paradox, questionable narrators, etc.) and a reaction against Enlightenment ideas implicit in Modernist literature. Postmodern literature, like postmodernism as a whole, is difficult to define and there is little agreement on the exact characteristics, scope, and importance of postmodern literature. Among postmodern writers are the Americans Henry Miller,William S. Burroughs, Joseph Heller, Kurt Vonnegut, Hunter S. Thompson, Truman Capote and Thomas Pynchon.
20th-century genre literature[edit]
Main article: Genre fiction
Agatha Christie (1890–1976) was a crime writer of novels, short stories and plays, who is best remembered for her 80detective novels as well as her successful plays for the West End theatre. Christie's works, particularly those featuring the detectives Hercule Poirot or Miss Marple, have given her the title the 'Queen of Crime' and she was one of the most important and innovative writers in this genre. Christie's novels include, Murder on the Orient Express, Death on the Nile andAnd Then There Were None. Another popular writer during the Golden Age of detective fiction was Dorothy L. Sayers(1893–1957). Other recent noteworthy writers in this genre are Ruth Rendell, P. D. James and Scot Ian Rankin.
Erskine Childers The Riddle of the Sands 1903, is an early example of the spy novel. A noted writer in the spy novel genre was John le Carré, while in thriller writing, Ian Fleming created the character James Bond 007 in January 1952, while on holiday at his Jamaican estate, Goldeneye. Fleming chronicled Bond's adventures in twelve novels, including Casino Royale(1953), Live and Let Die (1954), Dr. No (1958), Goldfinger (1959), Thunderball (1961), and nine short story works.
Hungarian-born Baroness Emma Orczy's (1865–1947) original play, The Scarlet Pimpernel, opened in October 1903 at Nottingham’s Theatre Royal and was not a success. However, with a rewritten last act, it opened at the New Theatre in London in January 1905. The premier of the London production was enthusiastically received by the audience, running 122 performances and enjoying numerous revivals. The Scarlet Pimpernel became a favourite of London audiences, playing more than 2,000 performances and becoming one of the most popular shows staged in England to that date.[citation needed]The novel The Scarlet Pimpernel was published soon after the play opened and was an immediate success. Orczy gained a following of readers in Britain and throughout the world. The popularity of the novel encouraged her to write a number of sequels for her "reckless daredevil" over the next 35 years. The play was performed to great acclaim in France, Italy, Germany and Spain, while the novel was translated into 16 languages. Subsequently, the story has been adapted for television, film, a musical and other media.
The novelist Georgette Heyer created the historical romance genre.
The Kailyard school of Scottish writers, notably J. M. Barrie (1869–1937), creator of Peter Pan (1904), presented an idealised version of society and brought of fantasy and folklore back into fashion. In 1908, Kenneth Grahame (1859–1932) wrote the children's classic The Wind in the Willows. An informal literary discussion group associated with the English faculty at the University of Oxford, were the "Inklings". Its leading members were the major fantasynovelists; C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien. Lewis is especially known for The Chronicles of Narnia, while Tolkien is best known as the author of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. Another significant writer is Alan Garner author of Elidor (1965), while Terry Pratchett is a more recent fantasy writer. Roald Dahl rose to prominence with his children's fantasy novels, such as James and the Giant Peach and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, often inspired by experiences from his childhood, which are notable for their often unexpected endings, and unsentimental, dark humour. J. K. Rowling author of the highly successful Harry Potterseries and Philip Pullman famous for his His Dark Materials trilogy are other significant authors of fantasy novels for younger readers.
Noted writers in the field of comic books are Neil Gaiman, and Alan Moore; Gaiman also produces graphic novels.
In the later decades of the 20th century, the genre of science fiction began to be taken more seriously because of the work of writers such as Arthur C. Clarke's (2001: A Space Odyssey), Isaac Asimov, Ursula K. Le Guin, Michael Moorcock and Kim Stanley Robinson. Another prominent writer in this genre, Douglas Adams, is particularly associated with the comic science fiction work, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, which began life as a radio series in 1978. Mainstream novelists suchDoris Lessing and Margaret Atwood also wrote works in this genre, while Scottish novelist Ian M. Banks has also achieved a reputation as both a writer of traditional and science fiction novels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)